| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
madman
Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 598
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| The Pro Fighter Qs had a built in LPT port, but I think the PFX lines required the add-on LPT card. I've never seen a PFX CD-ROM drive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyuusaku
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 941
Location: .ma.us
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here are all the true models:
-SPF
-SPF Q (parallel)
-SPF Q+ (parallel + built in RTS/slow motion card)
-PFX V1 (case looks like SPFQ)
-PFX V2 ("normal" looking)
-PFXT (*perhaps* multiple revisions of the same thing, just PCB/sticker revisions)
-DPF
SPFQ+ do exist and have a slightly different logo on the case.
The PFXT2 is just a PFX with upgraded BIOS and all the DPFX I have seen are identical to DPF with just a new case/sticker. DPFQ+ etc don't exist.
I'm pretty sure you have it right, PFX have DSP support, PFXT have built in Smart card support.
Note that parallel ports were not standard on SPFQ/Q+s, most don't have them. Fortunately, it's not too difficult to add one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Data33
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There was a Super Pro Fighter Q+ without a parallel port, I know cause I've got one.
Data33 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all info!
About the DPF and DPFX. Does anyone know if the DPFX have a DSP1 inside?
Ruger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyuusaku
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 941
Location: .ma.us
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DPFX is a DPF which cannot have one internally. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyuusaku
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 941
Location: .ma.us
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The PFX will say PFX; That's certainly a SPFQ+.
BTW, the SPFQ+ doesn't have an optional built in DSP like PFX(T?)s, it requires a plugin cart so it's not a special DSP version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Trenton_net
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 233
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heh, is there a copier line that has a more complicated naming convention than Pro Fighter?
Its like they looked at Capcom’s Street Fighter and decided “Heck, we can be more confusing than that!”  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kyuusaku wrote: | | BTW, the SPFQ+ doesn't have an optional built in DSP like PFX(T?)s, it requires a plugin cart so it's not a special DSP version. |
So even though the case says DSP it does not have one inside (?), but only says so to show that it can play DSP games if you have an external DSP cart (?).
So, this is the normal case for the SPFQ+ with RTS/slow-motion card?
Thank you kyuusaku for sharing your expertise!!!
Ruger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyuusaku
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 941
Location: .ma.us
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ruger wrote: | | So even though the case says DSP it does not have one inside (?), but only says so to show that it can play DSP games if you have an external DSP cart (?). |
Yes
| Ruger wrote: | | So, this is the normal case for the SPFQ+ with RTS/slow-motion card? |
SPFQ+ has RTS/slow-motion built in. This is why it's SPFQ+, SPFQ doesn't have it built in  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks kyuusaku!!
Regarding the the various Pro Fighter X Turbo models with Smart Card support:
Can it be that the "Pro Fighter X Turbo 3 in 1" is just a relabeled "Pro Fighter X Turbo 2", and that CCL did this when the Smart Cards went from being GB-only to being GB/GG.
If this is correct "3 in 1" might mean SFC, GB and GG - while 2 meant SFC and GB. Am I correct assuming this?
Ruger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyuusaku
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 941
Location: .ma.us
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ruger wrote: | Regarding the the various Pro Fighter X Turbo models with Smart Card support:
Can it be that the "Pro Fighter X Turbo 3 in 1" is just a relabeled "Pro Fighter X Turbo 2", and that CCL did this when the Smart Cards went from being GB-only to being GB/GG. |
AFAIK, all PFXT hardware is the same, including PFXT2. The only difference is the BIOS and label.
| Quote: | | If this is correct "3 in 1" might mean SFC, GB and GG - while 2 meant SFC and GB. Am I correct assuming this? |
I'm not sure but that sounds probable, the answer might be on the box. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thall
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 79
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes that one has an internal DSP chip, or at least it should have as the bios displays INTERNAL DSP: ON/OFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ruger
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 88
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thall wrote: |
Yes that one has an internal DSP chip, or at least it should have as the bios displays INTERNAL DSP: ON/OFF |
Thank you for helping out Thall! It's a jungle. Do you have one of these in your collection?
Ruger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
