ToToTEK.COM

Jagasian · Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 159

Check out the uCON64 site:
http://ucon64.sourceforge.net/

The Dumper · Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 49

timofonic · Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:06 am Post subject:

Any news about this?

The Dumper · Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 49

Not yet.

Jagasian · Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 159

Well, I can't wait to have uCON64 support for the SUperFlash. So lets keep talking about it until it happens Smile

dbjh · Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 167

It's been two weeks... Let's talk about it a lot. It might help :-)

The Dumper · Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 49

Daniel, have you seen the Super Flasher software? It's context sensitive with a simple GUI interface. It looks like it polls for the HW and if it finds a flash card inserted it will display what games are loaded in one of the windows. If it finds a normal cart it will display the cart info in a different window. You can perform operations based on what is inserted into the programmer. You can DL the software and run it without the programmer to see the layout. I'm wondering how uCON64 will support this without a GUI. We certainly can support it, it's just a matter of how to make easy to use without a GUI.

dbjh · Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 167

Yes, I've seen it. Displaying the current contents of the flash card is of course a feature of the SuperFlash software (not a feature of the hardware). All actions performed by uCON64 are initiated by the user, so I see no other way than to put this feature behind a separate option. We could also have two transfer (send) options, one to write data to the flash card regardless what's currently stored on it, and one to write data to it if there's enough room left. I have to admit that I prefer the former option, because if we do the later for the SuperFlash we should do the same for the other flash card programmers supported by uCON64.

Jagasian · Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 159

Suppafly · Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 191 Location: Mexico

Why dont you buy an old version of windows instead Smile

Jagasian · Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 159

Suppafly · Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 191 Location: Mexico

LOl its so easy to upset microsoft haters!

dbjh · Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 167

Please don't turn this into a flamewar. He simply answered your question. Perhaps you will think differently about Microsoft once you spend some time investigating *why* people dislike them.
Perhaps you haven't had your system infected by trojan horses simply because your PC was connected to the internet (happened to me).
Perhaps you never were fortunate enough to spend many hours reïnstalling software, because some virus infected *all* your executables (happened to me).
Perhaps you like to pay in the future, just to read your own documents (search for TCPA, Palladium or DRM).

Suppafly · Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 191 Location: Mexico

And perhaps you dont keep the windows patching and antivirus up to date Very Happy

I havent had a virus since 1997 or so....

dbjh · Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 167

I wrote it happened to me, *not* that it happened to me recently. But you miss an important point. The mean time before an unprotected PC that is connected to the internet gets infected has now dropped to 20 minutes, which is far too short to download the many patches for Windows XP. Regular users don't realise the importance of antivirus or firewall software until they experience the fun of having a virus or trojan on their PC. Windows XP is one big security loophole. That you haven't experienced any nastiness since 1997 is an exception, not the rule.